coreyburton.com Forum Index
Author Message

<  Welcome!  ~  Objectivity.

Tom Wagner
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:37 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 597 Location: Long Island, NY
How difficult is it to be objective about your own work? How critical do you want to be about your performances? I would say you don't want to be overly positive or negative so where/how do you find the "happy balance"? How important is it to be objective about your performances?

Thank you.

_________________
~ There's a Great, Big Beautiful Tomorrow...~
View user's profile Send private message
CB
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:52 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 905 Location: HERE!
Tom Wagner wrote:
How difficult is it to be objective about your own work?
I'd say it goes from practically impossible at the start of a new project or session - to no problem at all, the farther you get from the finished recording (in both time and physical distance from the studio space); at least for those of us who play a variety of characters. I don't know how someone who only performs in their own voice and personality can ever be truly objective, in that "the method" prescribes unconscious "natural behavior" without monitoring or "editing" how that behavior might play for the microphones and cameras.
Quote:
How critical do you want to be about your performances? I would say you don't want to be overly positive or negative so where/how do you find the "happy balance"?
Forget WHO you're listening to/watching, and respond as an audience member receiving the character and story without professional judgment. If anything about your character jars you out of the fantasy world of the scene, then you would want to focus on what isn't working, and why the illusion broke for you as an audience member. Most of the time it's because while performing, you stopped believing in the reality of the writer's vision, and tried to manipulate tone, image and emotion with calculated/mimicked mechanical gimmickry and mirror-rehearsed false-faced vocal "poses" delivered in a forced/exaggerated artificial timbre. The ultimate success is being able to enjoy your characterization just as if it were any other actor you'd admire for making you believe - and "live the fantasy".
Quote:
How important is it to be objective about your performances?
It is essential. Unforgivingly critical self-scrutiny is "death" to any performer. And no performer should take any criticism - positive OR negative - personally. It's all about The Characters.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tom Wagner
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:27 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 597 Location: Long Island, NY
CB wrote:
Unforgivingly critical self-scrutiny is "death" to any performer. And no performer should take any criticism - positive OR negative - personally. It's all about The Characters.
But what if the criticism is with The Character? Can/should you take criticism and apply it to your performance or is that "death" as well?

Thank you.
View user's profile Send private message
CB
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:09 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 905 Location: HERE!
Tom Wagner wrote:
But what if the criticism is with The Character? Can/should you take criticism and apply it to your performance or is that "death" as well?
Absolutely. If the character isn't working, or doesn't click with what you or the writers/directors have in mind, then you all must work to come up with something that everyone feels is right, as a foundation. After that, you all work in creative concert to bring it to life, with brutal honesty and fearless experimentation. The character's feelings of course do not suffer, no matter how harsh the opinions might be towards its' particular components.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lucien
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:47 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 182 Location: Los Angeles
What about the factor of which take was used during the session? If a line falls flat or shrill on your ear, are you able to remember if it was "That one take I didn't care for"?

_________________
~Can't I Scream in Peace?~
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CB
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:50 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 905 Location: HERE!
Lucien wrote:
...are you able to remember if it was "That one take I didn't care for"?
As an unfortunate "rule of thumb", I find that the takes chosen by the director and/or committee do tend to be the ones I liked the least. In fact, my favorite bits of dialogue performance usually surprise the hell out of me, because I never take "mental notes" when a well-written scene or individual cue is going perfectly well - I'm too busy enjoying being immersed in "the moment".

But yes - unless you've got a fiercely independent director/producer with a preference for those unexpected "Road Less Travelled" moments of freewheeling inspiration at the microphone, you can pretty much count on what Daws called "the safe, predictable cosmetic read" being selected to "print"*. The trick is to hold back on giving any line that kind of "safe on the nose" delivery in the first place, until your most inventive angles have been explored and considered; before finally offering something conventional for the director to have as a default they won't have trouble "selling" to the executive committee later. Then, as the character eventually takes on a life of its own, the more creative and expressively satisfying impulses slowly established over several sessions become comfortably familiar to the ears of the production staff, and it's no longer so imperative to "play it safe" from then on.

Of course, if your creative impulses misfire, and you feel you've "hit a clinker", you can always plant a seed of doubt before it leaves the recording studio, and re-deliver it in a more pleasing way; and if you notice it "goes wrong" before the line fully concludes, there's always the old character actor's "wild card" trick of sabotaging or bailing-out of the take - which naturally forces a (hopefully improved) re-take. …Just try to limit such antics to a minimum, or risk becoming a tiresome session-dragging source of disruptions wherever you show up to perform.

(*an archane reference to the days when optical soundtrack recording was done directly onto unexposed motion picture film stock, with only selected takes sent to the lab for processing and duplication).
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Post new topic

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum